<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 48 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, setting aside the demand of service tax on consulting engineering service and royalty payment. It rejected the claim for service tax on technical support fee, emphasizing that new issues cannot be raised at a later stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 48 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, setting aside the demand of service tax on consulting engineering service and royalty payment. It rejected the claim for service tax on technical support fee, emphasizing that new issues cannot be raised at a later stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>