<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 45 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428487</link>
    <description>HC allowed the intra-Court appeal challenging the dismissal of a writ petition. The court found the appellant was not provided an adverse report and lacked effective hearing opportunity. The HC granted a fresh hearing opportunity, directing the appellant to pay Rs. 15 lacs within six weeks and cooperate with appellate proceedings. The order emphasized procedural fairness and the need for transparent administrative processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 45 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428487</link>
      <description>HC allowed the intra-Court appeal challenging the dismissal of a writ petition. The court found the appellant was not provided an adverse report and lacked effective hearing opportunity. The HC granted a fresh hearing opportunity, directing the appellant to pay Rs. 15 lacs within six weeks and cooperate with appellate proceedings. The order emphasized procedural fairness and the need for transparent administrative processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>