<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 44 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428486</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, directing the appellant to file an appeal before the appellate authority within five weeks. The court stayed further recovery, considering the already recovered Rs.29 lakhs as part of mandatory pre-deposit. The jurisdictional challenge was deemed appropriate for the appellate authority to address, and the appellant was granted liberty to file an interlocutory application to lift the bank account lien.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 44 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428486</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, directing the appellant to file an appeal before the appellate authority within five weeks. The court stayed further recovery, considering the already recovered Rs.29 lakhs as part of mandatory pre-deposit. The jurisdictional challenge was deemed appropriate for the appellate authority to address, and the appellant was granted liberty to file an interlocutory application to lift the bank account lien.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>