<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30581</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal, affirming that the translation losses incurred by EOGIL were real and deductible under Section 42(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as per the provisions of the Production Sharing Contract. The court emphasized the unique accounting regime of the PSC, requiring recognition of currency translation gains and losses, validating the assessee&#039;s claim for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30581</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal, affirming that the translation losses incurred by EOGIL were real and deductible under Section 42(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as per the provisions of the Production Sharing Contract. The court emphasized the unique accounting regime of the PSC, requiring recognition of currency translation gains and losses, validating the assessee&#039;s claim for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>