<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428459</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the application for condonation of delay, condoning a 351-day delay in filing the appeal. Despite the appellants&#039; counsel&#039;s reference to pending writ petitions, the Court chose not to interfere with the interim order and dismissed the appeal, allowing the appellants to raise all points in the pending writ petitions. The judgment emphasized the need for expeditiously providing a certified copy of the order to the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 09:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428459</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the application for condonation of delay, condoning a 351-day delay in filing the appeal. Despite the appellants&#039; counsel&#039;s reference to pending writ petitions, the Court chose not to interfere with the interim order and dismissed the appeal, allowing the appellants to raise all points in the pending writ petitions. The judgment emphasized the need for expeditiously providing a certified copy of the order to the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>