<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428453</link>
    <description>The High Court granted a stay of the freezing order, allowing the appellants to present their case properly by filing an affidavit-in-opposition within a specified timeframe. The Court found the appeal maintainable as the Single Judge had not addressed the prayer to quash the specific case mentioned in the writ petition. The order under appeal was deemed interlocutory, focusing solely on the stay of the freezing order. The High Court directed the parties to maintain the status quo regarding the frozen accounts and to rely on cited judgments during further proceedings before the Single Judge, refraining from delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 09:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428453</link>
      <description>The High Court granted a stay of the freezing order, allowing the appellants to present their case properly by filing an affidavit-in-opposition within a specified timeframe. The Court found the appeal maintainable as the Single Judge had not addressed the prayer to quash the specific case mentioned in the writ petition. The order under appeal was deemed interlocutory, focusing solely on the stay of the freezing order. The High Court directed the parties to maintain the status quo regarding the frozen accounts and to rely on cited judgments during further proceedings before the Single Judge, refraining from delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>