<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2096 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304523</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, reversing the additions made under Sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the opportunity for cross-examination and the necessity of corroborative evidence in making assessments. The decision highlighted that assessments relying solely on suspicion and uncorroborated statements without independent inquiry are not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 09:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2096 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304523</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, reversing the additions made under Sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the opportunity for cross-examination and the necessity of corroborative evidence in making assessments. The decision highlighted that assessments relying solely on suspicion and uncorroborated statements without independent inquiry are not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>