<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1668 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304526</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE (AT) allowed multiple grounds for the assessee: upheld aggregation for benchmarking manufacturing transactions; directed inclusion of export incentives in operating income; confirmed PLI should be measured as net profit to sales; directed AO/TPO to apply a 5% tolerance under proviso to s.92C(2) where variation falls within range; remanded the management-fee issue to AO/TPO to examine applicability of an APA and relevant agreements; remitted s.14A disallowance for fresh adjudication per prior Tribunal order; held DSIR certification governs entitlement under s.35(2AB) and cannot be interfered with by the Tribunal; allowed claim for additional depreciation per binding HC precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1668 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304526</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE (AT) allowed multiple grounds for the assessee: upheld aggregation for benchmarking manufacturing transactions; directed inclusion of export incentives in operating income; confirmed PLI should be measured as net profit to sales; directed AO/TPO to apply a 5% tolerance under proviso to s.92C(2) where variation falls within range; remanded the management-fee issue to AO/TPO to examine applicability of an APA and relevant agreements; remitted s.14A disallowance for fresh adjudication per prior Tribunal order; held DSIR certification governs entitlement under s.35(2AB) and cannot be interfered with by the Tribunal; allowed claim for additional depreciation per binding HC precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>