<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428443</link>
    <description>STPI registration as a 100% export oriented unit satisfied the approval requirement for deduction under section 10B where the other eligibility conditions were not disputed, and the deduction could not be denied merely because approval was granted through the STPI route. The attempted restriction under section 10B(7) read with section 80IA(10) also failed because the record did not show material establishing an arrangement with foreign associated enterprises to earn more than ordinary profits; higher margins or arm&#039;s length pricing findings alone were insufficient. On that basis, the deduction was allowed and the revenue&#039;s challenge to the addition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428443</link>
      <description>STPI registration as a 100% export oriented unit satisfied the approval requirement for deduction under section 10B where the other eligibility conditions were not disputed, and the deduction could not be denied merely because approval was granted through the STPI route. The attempted restriction under section 10B(7) read with section 80IA(10) also failed because the record did not show material establishing an arrangement with foreign associated enterprises to earn more than ordinary profits; higher margins or arm&#039;s length pricing findings alone were insufficient. On that basis, the deduction was allowed and the revenue&#039;s challenge to the addition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>