<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 428 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304522</link>
    <description>Cognizance under the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be taken on an incomplete police report, because section 173(2) contemplates a report only after investigation is complete and section 190(1)(b) requires a valid police report. An incomplete charge-sheet filed before completion of investigation is not such a report, and any cognizance or process based on it is unsustainable. An order extending limitation under sections 468 and 473 must also be a reasoned judicial order passed before cognizance, after notice to the accused and an opportunity of hearing; a mechanical ex parte order without reasons is illegal and without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:39:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 428 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304522</link>
      <description>Cognizance under the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be taken on an incomplete police report, because section 173(2) contemplates a report only after investigation is complete and section 190(1)(b) requires a valid police report. An incomplete charge-sheet filed before completion of investigation is not such a report, and any cognizance or process based on it is unsustainable. An order extending limitation under sections 468 and 473 must also be a reasoned judicial order passed before cognizance, after notice to the accused and an opportunity of hearing; a mechanical ex parte order without reasons is illegal and without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>