<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1340 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428395</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that services provided by AB Commercial were classified as transportation services taxable under Goods Transport Agency (GTA), not Cargo Handling Service. The Tribunal found the refund claim of Rs.2,22,119/- under Notification No.17/2009 was valid, supported by documentary evidence and precedents. The Adjudicating authority&#039;s disallowance of the refund was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders, allowing the appeal and granting the refund with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1340 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428395</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that services provided by AB Commercial were classified as transportation services taxable under Goods Transport Agency (GTA), not Cargo Handling Service. The Tribunal found the refund claim of Rs.2,22,119/- under Notification No.17/2009 was valid, supported by documentary evidence and precedents. The Adjudicating authority&#039;s disallowance of the refund was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders, allowing the appeal and granting the refund with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>