<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1321 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428376</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed based on technical aspects, including the jurisdiction of notice u/s 143(1)(a) during pending assessment proceedings, the merger of orders u/s 143(1) and u/s 143(3), and the impact of the intimation u/s 143(1) after notice u/s 143(2). The assessee successfully argued against the adjustments made by CPC, resulting in the appeal being allowed due to the non-existence of the intimation on record and the consequent demand, rendering the appeal infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1321 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428376</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed based on technical aspects, including the jurisdiction of notice u/s 143(1)(a) during pending assessment proceedings, the merger of orders u/s 143(1) and u/s 143(3), and the impact of the intimation u/s 143(1) after notice u/s 143(2). The assessee successfully argued against the adjustments made by CPC, resulting in the appeal being allowed due to the non-existence of the intimation on record and the consequent demand, rendering the appeal infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>