<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1307 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428362</link>
    <description>Under the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007, customs may suspend clearance of imported goods where there is reason to believe they infringe intellectual property rights, and the recorded customs assurance that the impugned container would not be permitted into India was treated as sufficient for the immediate relief sought. The Rules also permit customs, at the request of the right holder and subject to confidentiality, to disclose the importer&#039;s name, address and other relevant consignment details if available. The article notes that the matter was disposed of after recording that the consignment had not been allowed entry and that customs must continue to act within the enforcement framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1307 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428362</link>
      <description>Under the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007, customs may suspend clearance of imported goods where there is reason to believe they infringe intellectual property rights, and the recorded customs assurance that the impugned container would not be permitted into India was treated as sufficient for the immediate relief sought. The Rules also permit customs, at the request of the right holder and subject to confidentiality, to disclose the importer&#039;s name, address and other relevant consignment details if available. The article notes that the matter was disposed of after recording that the consignment had not been allowed entry and that customs must continue to act within the enforcement framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>