https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428360 The court declined to grant permission for the re-export of seized goods due to their interception and storage. The petitioner's request for provisional release was rejected for lack of a bank guarantee. The court directed Customs authorities to decide on the provisional release applications within one week, without expressing opinions on the case's merits. The petition was disposed of, allowing direct service and leaving the determination of specific conditions for release to Customs authorities. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428360 The court declined to grant permission for the re-export of seized goods due to their interception and storage. The petitioner's request for provisional release was rejected for lack of a bank guarantee. The court directed Customs authorities to decide on the provisional release applications within one week, without expressing opinions on the case's merits. The petition was disposed of, allowing direct service and leaving the determination of specific conditions for release to Customs authorities. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428360