<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1303 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428358</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioner&#039;s request for provisional release of imported goods against a bond and bank guarantee. The petitioner sought the release of goods and waiver of demurrage charges due to unnecessary detention. The court allowed the petitioner to move an application to amend the writ petition and ordered the provisional release of goods against a bank guarantee equivalent to 25% of the duty differential. The respondents were directed to process the release application promptly, clarifying that the provisional release would not affect the case&#039;s merits. Further proceedings were scheduled, with parties instructed to act on the digitally signed order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1303 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428358</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioner&#039;s request for provisional release of imported goods against a bond and bank guarantee. The petitioner sought the release of goods and waiver of demurrage charges due to unnecessary detention. The court allowed the petitioner to move an application to amend the writ petition and ordered the provisional release of goods against a bank guarantee equivalent to 25% of the duty differential. The respondents were directed to process the release application promptly, clarifying that the provisional release would not affect the case&#039;s merits. Further proceedings were scheduled, with parties instructed to act on the digitally signed order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>