<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1297 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Delay Condonation Application, upholding the decision to reject the Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to file within the prescribed time frame, despite citing delay in receiving the certified copy as the reason. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due diligence in promptly applying for a certified copy after the order pronouncement to meet the limitation requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Appellant&#039;s argument regarding the delay being only 9 days was rejected, as the delay exceeded 15 days beyond the prescribed period. Ultimately, the Memo of Appeal was rejected, and the Appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1297 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Delay Condonation Application, upholding the decision to reject the Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to file within the prescribed time frame, despite citing delay in receiving the certified copy as the reason. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due diligence in promptly applying for a certified copy after the order pronouncement to meet the limitation requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Appellant&#039;s argument regarding the delay being only 9 days was rejected, as the delay exceeded 15 days beyond the prescribed period. Ultimately, the Memo of Appeal was rejected, and the Appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>