<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1296 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was not maintainable as it did not meet the Rs. 1 Crore threshold requirement. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the Authority&#039;s jurisdiction to revive applications but emphasizing that the specific application failed to satisfy the pecuniary threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1296 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was not maintainable as it did not meet the Rs. 1 Crore threshold requirement. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the Authority&#039;s jurisdiction to revive applications but emphasizing that the specific application failed to satisfy the pecuniary threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>