<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30554</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the disallowance of the claim under Section 32(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of machinery usage for business purposes during the relevant period. The decision was based on the consistent findings of non-usage by all authorities and in accordance with legal interpretations from relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30554</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the disallowance of the claim under Section 32(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of machinery usage for business purposes during the relevant period. The decision was based on the consistent findings of non-usage by all authorities and in accordance with legal interpretations from relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>