<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1385 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304506</link>
    <description>A delay of 331 days in filing the revenue appeal was not condoned because no sufficient cause was shown for the inordinate delay. The court considered the explanation offered and the prejudice to the assessee, including loss of the opportunity to exercise the statutory option under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 within time. On that basis, the delay was held unjustified and the request for condonation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:39:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1385 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304506</link>
      <description>A delay of 331 days in filing the revenue appeal was not condoned because no sufficient cause was shown for the inordinate delay. The court considered the explanation offered and the prejudice to the assessee, including loss of the opportunity to exercise the statutory option under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 within time. On that basis, the delay was held unjustified and the request for condonation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>