<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1694 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of alleged mistakes in the order dated September 27, 2017, emphasizing that the rectification sought was beyond the permissible scope of adjustments under section 143(1)(a) and section 154. The Tribunal found the issue raised by the assessee to be debatable and not a mistake apparent from the record, affirming the original decision. The Tribunal concluded that the Miscellaneous Application essentially sought a review of its decision, which was not permissible under the law, and therefore, the application was dismissed with no merit found in the assessee&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1694 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of alleged mistakes in the order dated September 27, 2017, emphasizing that the rectification sought was beyond the permissible scope of adjustments under section 143(1)(a) and section 154. The Tribunal found the issue raised by the assessee to be debatable and not a mistake apparent from the record, affirming the original decision. The Tribunal concluded that the Miscellaneous Application essentially sought a review of its decision, which was not permissible under the law, and therefore, the application was dismissed with no merit found in the assessee&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>