<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1289 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the denial of CENVAT Credit and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was justified as the Applicant had availed credit based on invalid invoices issued by the Head Office, which was not registered as an &#039;Input Service Distributor&#039;. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit 10% of the credit amount within eight weeks, with non-compliance leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1289 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the denial of CENVAT Credit and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was justified as the Applicant had availed credit based on invalid invoices issued by the Head Office, which was not registered as an &#039;Input Service Distributor&#039;. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit 10% of the credit amount within eight weeks, with non-compliance leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>