<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304493</link>
    <description>Interim bail on medical grounds need not be extended where the prisoner is stable and the required treatment is available within jail premises. The Delhi HC noted that the discharge summary showed the petitioner was in stable condition and that treatment could be provided in Tihar Jail, making continued interim bail unwarranted. It also recorded that the recovery was commercial in nature, so the statutory bar under the NDPS Act applied, and rejected the argument that completion of investigation made custody unnecessary. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to seek successive reliefs without disclosing an earlier order was also disapproved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304493</link>
      <description>Interim bail on medical grounds need not be extended where the prisoner is stable and the required treatment is available within jail premises. The Delhi HC noted that the discharge summary showed the petitioner was in stable condition and that treatment could be provided in Tihar Jail, making continued interim bail unwarranted. It also recorded that the recovery was commercial in nature, so the statutory bar under the NDPS Act applied, and rejected the argument that completion of investigation made custody unnecessary. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to seek successive reliefs without disclosing an earlier order was also disapproved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>