https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304492 Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC permits a court to direct scientific examination of a document when it is relevant to the dispute. Here, the disputed Will was central, and the Bombay HC accepted that examination could proceed with safeguards, including inspection without removing the lamination and in the presence of the parties or their representatives. The Court treated concerns about tampering or damage as addressed by those precautions, and held that questions about the expert report's usefulness or the ability to determine the age of ink were matters for consideration after the report was received. The trial court was left to assess the parties' objections under Order XXVI Rule 10-A(2). en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304492 Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC permits a court to direct scientific examination of a document when it is relevant to the dispute. Here, the disputed Will was central, and the Bombay HC accepted that examination could proceed with safeguards, including inspection without removing the lamination and in the presence of the parties or their representatives. The Court treated concerns about tampering or damage as addressed by those precautions, and held that questions about the expert report's usefulness or the ability to determine the age of ink were matters for consideration after the report was received. The trial court was left to assess the parties' objections under Order XXVI Rule 10-A(2). Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304492