<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1424 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304499</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal before the ITAT was not maintainable because the tax effect was below the CBDT&#039;s enhanced monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for departmental appeals. The Tribunal applied Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, read with the clarification dated 20 August 2019 extending the limit to pending appeals, and held that the appeal did not meet the prescribed threshold. The appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1424 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304499</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal before the ITAT was not maintainable because the tax effect was below the CBDT&#039;s enhanced monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for departmental appeals. The Tribunal applied Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, read with the clarification dated 20 August 2019 extending the limit to pending appeals, and held that the appeal did not meet the prescribed threshold. The appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>