https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304500 The Delhi High Court considered an application invoking its inherent jurisdiction for deletion of a petitioner from the array of parties on the ground that he was no longer in charge of the company's management and was not named as an accused in the FIR. As the respondents accepted notice and did not oppose the request, the Court allowed the application and ordered deletion of petitioner No. 3 from the array of parties. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304500 The Delhi High Court considered an application invoking its inherent jurisdiction for deletion of a petitioner from the array of parties on the ground that he was no longer in charge of the company's management and was not named as an accused in the FIR. As the respondents accepted notice and did not oppose the request, the Court allowed the application and ordered deletion of petitioner No. 3 from the array of parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304500