https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304482 An appeal under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act had to be filed within thirty days, and delay could be condoned only on proof of sufficient cause for the entire period. The court noted that medical evidence did not establish continuous illness throughout the delay, no explanation covered the intervals when the employee was fit, and an alleged earlier appeal to the employer was unproved. It further stated that limitation under the statutory scheme could not be ignored on abstract notions of justice. On that basis, writ interference was justified and the condonation order was set aside. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:58:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304482 An appeal under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act had to be filed within thirty days, and delay could be condoned only on proof of sufficient cause for the entire period. The court noted that medical evidence did not establish continuous illness throughout the delay, no explanation covered the intervals when the employee was fit, and an alleged earlier appeal to the employer was unproved. It further stated that limitation under the statutory scheme could not be ignored on abstract notions of justice. On that basis, writ interference was justified and the condonation order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304482