<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1455 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified a mistake in its order regarding the deduction on account of additional contribution in the case of the assessee. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in directing the Assessing Officer to verify the amount paid as additional contribution and instead affirmed the decision in favor of the assessee based on a similar case. The Tribunal clarified that limitations under Rule 87 do not apply to additional contributions for fund deficits discovered during actuarial valuation. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application, rectifying the mistake in the order pronounced on June 15, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:24:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1455 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified a mistake in its order regarding the deduction on account of additional contribution in the case of the assessee. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in directing the Assessing Officer to verify the amount paid as additional contribution and instead affirmed the decision in favor of the assessee based on a similar case. The Tribunal clarified that limitations under Rule 87 do not apply to additional contributions for fund deficits discovered during actuarial valuation. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application, rectifying the mistake in the order pronounced on June 15, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>