https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30543 A request to recall or modify an earlier stay order directing deposit of 50% of the disputed amount was rejected because a later order passed by a collateral Bench did not justify interference with the earlier order. The Tribunal noted that the earlier order had not been shown to the later Bench and that the applicant had already challenged the earlier order before the High Court and then withdrawn that challenge. On those facts, the subsequent order could not serve as a basis for recall or modification, and the application was dismissed. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30543 A request to recall or modify an earlier stay order directing deposit of 50% of the disputed amount was rejected because a later order passed by a collateral Bench did not justify interference with the earlier order. The Tribunal noted that the earlier order had not been shown to the later Bench and that the applicant had already challenged the earlier order before the High Court and then withdrawn that challenge. On those facts, the subsequent order could not serve as a basis for recall or modification, and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30543