https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428282 The respondent was found to have failed to comply with domestic laws under the BIS Act, 2016, and the CRO, 2012, as well as not obtaining DGFT authorization for importing second-hand goods under the FTP, 2015-20. The failure to produce a Chartered Engineer certificate led to non-compliance with hazardous waste rules. Consequently, the value of imported goods was re-determined, and goods declared as 'Old & Used Digital Multifunction Print and Copying Machines' were confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962. Redemption fines and penalties were imposed, but the impugned goods were provisionally released based on legal precedents. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428282 The respondent was found to have failed to comply with domestic laws under the BIS Act, 2016, and the CRO, 2012, as well as not obtaining DGFT authorization for importing second-hand goods under the FTP, 2015-20. The failure to produce a Chartered Engineer certificate led to non-compliance with hazardous waste rules. Consequently, the value of imported goods was re-determined, and goods declared as 'Old & Used Digital Multifunction Print and Copying Machines' were confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962. Redemption fines and penalties were imposed, but the impugned goods were provisionally released based on legal precedents. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428282