https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428276 The review petition was allowed, ensuring that the previous judgment's observations would not impact the Review Petitioner's property rights. The court emphasized balancing the moratorium provisions with the case's specific facts, recognizing the Review Petitioner's crystallized rights upheld by previous court orders. The property, held in trust for the Review Petitioner, was excluded from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, with modifications made to the Impugned Order to safeguard the Review Petitioner's property rights upon payment of the balance consideration. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428276 The review petition was allowed, ensuring that the previous judgment's observations would not impact the Review Petitioner's property rights. The court emphasized balancing the moratorium provisions with the case's specific facts, recognizing the Review Petitioner's crystallized rights upheld by previous court orders. The property, held in trust for the Review Petitioner, was excluded from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, with modifications made to the Impugned Order to safeguard the Review Petitioner's property rights upon payment of the balance consideration. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428276