https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428266 The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that duty was not demandable on broken bottles within permissible limits, the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the appeals, the appellants complied with applicable circulars, and the extended period for demand was not justified. The decision was based on established precedents and specifics of the case, emphasizing the binding nature of departmental instructions and the retrospective application of beneficial circulars. en-us Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:02:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428266 The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that duty was not demandable on broken bottles within permissible limits, the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the appeals, the appellants complied with applicable circulars, and the extended period for demand was not justified. The decision was based on established precedents and specifics of the case, emphasizing the binding nature of departmental instructions and the retrospective application of beneficial circulars. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428266