<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1208 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428263</link>
    <description>Where disputed promissory notes and cheques were sought to be sent for expert examination to determine the age of the ink and whether writings were filled up after signature, the Court held that no dependable scientific method exists to ascertain ink age with accuracy. It found that such an examination would not produce a conclusive result or assist the defence, and would only delay the proceedings. The request for scientific testing was therefore rejected as futile and unsustainable, and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1208 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428263</link>
      <description>Where disputed promissory notes and cheques were sought to be sent for expert examination to determine the age of the ink and whether writings were filled up after signature, the Court held that no dependable scientific method exists to ascertain ink age with accuracy. It found that such an examination would not produce a conclusive result or assist the defence, and would only delay the proceedings. The request for scientific testing was therefore rejected as futile and unsustainable, and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>