<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1073 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking a stay on the operation of the order and recovery notice, as it found that the actions taken by the GST Authority post the liquidation order were in accordance with the legal provisions of the IBC, 2016. The Tribunal emphasized that once the order of liquidation is passed, the moratorium ceases, allowing legal proceedings to continue against the Corporate Debtor during liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1073 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking a stay on the operation of the order and recovery notice, as it found that the actions taken by the GST Authority post the liquidation order were in accordance with the legal provisions of the IBC, 2016. The Tribunal emphasized that once the order of liquidation is passed, the moratorium ceases, allowing legal proceedings to continue against the Corporate Debtor during liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>