https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304468 Commercial rivalry alone does not bar Article 226 maintainability where an existing stage-carriage operator challenges a fresh permit on grounds of illegality, arbitrariness, lack of jurisdiction, or colourable exercise of power; such a grievance remains justiciable, subject to an efficacious alternative remedy. The same principle applies where permit holders complain that transport authorities have acted unlawfully, or failed to act, in relation to other operators violating the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 or the applicable rules and policy guidelines; the High Court may entertain the petition in appropriate cases of statutory violation, again subject to alternative-remedy principles. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:01:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304468 Commercial rivalry alone does not bar Article 226 maintainability where an existing stage-carriage operator challenges a fresh permit on grounds of illegality, arbitrariness, lack of jurisdiction, or colourable exercise of power; such a grievance remains justiciable, subject to an efficacious alternative remedy. The same principle applies where permit holders complain that transport authorities have acted unlawfully, or failed to act, in relation to other operators violating the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 or the applicable rules and policy guidelines; the High Court may entertain the petition in appropriate cases of statutory violation, again subject to alternative-remedy principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304468