https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304478 The HC upheld a penalty under WBGST Act against the petitioner for transporting goods without an e-way bill. The petitioner claimed to have generated the e-way bill within two hours of interception but failed to provide evidence. The appellate authority found the e-way bill was actually filed the day after detention. The court declined to grant an interim order against coercive action, directed respondents to file opposition affidavits within four weeks, and scheduled final hearing in seven weeks. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304478 The HC upheld a penalty under WBGST Act against the petitioner for transporting goods without an e-way bill. The petitioner claimed to have generated the e-way bill within two hours of interception but failed to provide evidence. The appellate authority found the e-way bill was actually filed the day after detention. The court declined to grant an interim order against coercive action, directed respondents to file opposition affidavits within four weeks, and scheduled final hearing in seven weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304478