<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1202 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428257</link>
    <description>The SC condoned a 16-day delay in filing the appeal and remanded the tax case for fresh consideration. The Court directed the appellate authority to evaluate whether there was an intentional tax evasion, requiring the appellant to obtain a transporter&#039;s affidavit. The original order was set aside, with instructions to reconsider the matter on merits and within specified timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1202 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428257</link>
      <description>The SC condoned a 16-day delay in filing the appeal and remanded the tax case for fresh consideration. The Court directed the appellate authority to evaluate whether there was an intentional tax evasion, requiring the appellant to obtain a transporter&#039;s affidavit. The original order was set aside, with instructions to reconsider the matter on merits and within specified timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>