https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428250 In alleged GST-related economic offences, continued custody is not justified merely because investigation is still pending; the court must assess whether specific detention is necessary and whether the accused's presence at trial can be secured by conditions. Here, the complaint had been filed, the material was largely documentary and electronic, substantial recovery had already been made, and no final statutory liability had been determined. On that factual basis, the court found no demonstrated need for further custody and granted regular bail subject to stringent conditions protecting the investigation and trial. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428250 In alleged GST-related economic offences, continued custody is not justified merely because investigation is still pending; the court must assess whether specific detention is necessary and whether the accused's presence at trial can be secured by conditions. Here, the complaint had been filed, the material was largely documentary and electronic, substantial recovery had already been made, and no final statutory liability had been determined. On that factual basis, the court found no demonstrated need for further custody and granted regular bail subject to stringent conditions protecting the investigation and trial. Case-Laws GST Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428250