<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1187 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding it abated due to the settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and determining that the revision proceedings ceased to have effect following the settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1187 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding it abated due to the settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and determining that the revision proceedings ceased to have effect following the settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>