https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428215 Anticipatory bail was granted in a money-laundering prosecution because the material before the Court did not show a sufficient basis for pre-trial custody. The complaint alleged generation, layering, diversion and projection of proceeds of crime, but the Court noted that the Enforcement Directorate had not arrested the accused when the complaint was filed. It also treated the petitioner's alleged role as distinct and did not treat the cited criminal antecedents, which related to the same time span, as a ground to deny relief at that stage. Applying the settled principle that bail depends on the cumulative effect of circumstances, the Court held that the facts did not justify refusal of anticipatory bail. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428215 Anticipatory bail was granted in a money-laundering prosecution because the material before the Court did not show a sufficient basis for pre-trial custody. The complaint alleged generation, layering, diversion and projection of proceeds of crime, but the Court noted that the Enforcement Directorate had not arrested the accused when the complaint was filed. It also treated the petitioner's alleged role as distinct and did not treat the cited criminal antecedents, which related to the same time span, as a ground to deny relief at that stage. Applying the settled principle that bail depends on the cumulative effect of circumstances, the Court held that the facts did not justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428215