https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304451 A challenge to a lookout circular and related coercive action was not decided on the merits at that stage because the respondents stated that notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 had been served, the State did not oppose quashing in relation to one FIR, and the lookout circular referred to by the Union of India pertained to a different FIR. In light of those clarifications, the court declined final adjudication of the prayer clauses then pressed and directed the matter to be renotified for further consideration. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:16:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304451 A challenge to a lookout circular and related coercive action was not decided on the merits at that stage because the respondents stated that notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 had been served, the State did not oppose quashing in relation to one FIR, and the lookout circular referred to by the Union of India pertained to a different FIR. In light of those clarifications, the court declined final adjudication of the prayer clauses then pressed and directed the matter to be renotified for further consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304451