<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1278 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304452</link>
    <description>Bail in an NDPS prosecution involving 100 grams of heroin, below commercial quantity, was assessed on ordinary bail principles because Section 37&#039;s stricter rigour did not apply in full. Criminal antecedents were treated as relevant but not decisive, and the petitioner&#039;s serious diabetic condition and leg swelling were treated as significant medical circumstances. To reduce any risk to the investigation, witnesses, and trial appearance, the Court noted that stringent conditions could be imposed. Bail was granted on medical grounds and because the alleged recovery was below commercial quantity, subject to strict safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1278 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304452</link>
      <description>Bail in an NDPS prosecution involving 100 grams of heroin, below commercial quantity, was assessed on ordinary bail principles because Section 37&#039;s stricter rigour did not apply in full. Criminal antecedents were treated as relevant but not decisive, and the petitioner&#039;s serious diabetic condition and leg swelling were treated as significant medical circumstances. To reduce any risk to the investigation, witnesses, and trial appearance, the Court noted that stringent conditions could be imposed. Bail was granted on medical grounds and because the alleged recovery was below commercial quantity, subject to strict safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>