https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30527 Appellants were permitted to raise additional grounds under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules because the Revenue raised no objection and the amendment to the Finance Act introduced a mining-related service provision relevant to the dispute. The Tribunal treated the proposed grounds as legal grounds requiring consideration and held that permission to raise them was justified. The appellants were directed to file a fresh ST-5 form incorporating the additional grounds before the next hearing. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30527 Appellants were permitted to raise additional grounds under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules because the Revenue raised no objection and the amendment to the Finance Act introduced a mining-related service provision relevant to the dispute. The Tribunal treated the proposed grounds as legal grounds requiring consideration and held that permission to raise them was justified. The appellants were directed to file a fresh ST-5 form incorporating the additional grounds before the next hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30527