https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304445 Permission to travel abroad was refused where a pending criminal investigation and a Look Out Circular were in force, because the Court treated the risk of evasion as overriding the request on the facts. It distinguished the precedent relied on for removal of Look Out Circular restraints, noting that an active investigation and a serious financial scam justified continued travel restriction even though the accused had earlier cooperated. The plea based on personal liberty was not accepted as controlling in the circumstances, and the challenge to the refusal of permission failed. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:15:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304445 Permission to travel abroad was refused where a pending criminal investigation and a Look Out Circular were in force, because the Court treated the risk of evasion as overriding the request on the facts. It distinguished the precedent relied on for removal of Look Out Circular restraints, noting that an active investigation and a serious financial scam justified continued travel restriction even though the accused had earlier cooperated. The plea based on personal liberty was not accepted as controlling in the circumstances, and the challenge to the refusal of permission failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304445