<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30526</link>
    <description>The appellant was required to make an additional pre-deposit of Rs. 1.30 lakhs within eight weeks, over and above the amount already deposited. On compliance, the remaining service tax demand and the penalties were waived. The operative effect was that partial deposit was treated as a condition for relief from the balance tax liability and penalty exposure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30526</link>
      <description>The appellant was required to make an additional pre-deposit of Rs. 1.30 lakhs within eight weeks, over and above the amount already deposited. On compliance, the remaining service tax demand and the penalties were waived. The operative effect was that partial deposit was treated as a condition for relief from the balance tax liability and penalty exposure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>