<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1137 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete disallowances on interest on a loan used to purchase shares and processing fees paid to banks. It found the expenses were incurred for business purposes, allowing them as deductions under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that concessions made before the AO do not prevent challenging issues on appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:30:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1137 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete disallowances on interest on a loan used to purchase shares and processing fees paid to banks. It found the expenses were incurred for business purposes, allowing them as deductions under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that concessions made before the AO do not prevent challenging issues on appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>