<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1136 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding the quantum addition, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s restricted addition of Rs. 6,33,339. However, the appeal concerning the penalty was allowed, directing the deletion of the entire penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, supporting the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1136 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding the quantum addition, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s restricted addition of Rs. 6,33,339. However, the appeal concerning the penalty was allowed, directing the deletion of the entire penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, supporting the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>