<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 180 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30520</link>
    <description>Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 was applied to accept reasonable cause for delayed payment of service tax during the initial period after banking and financial services entered the service tax net from 10-9-2004, so the penalty was reduced. However, the delay continued beyond that initial period, and complete waiver was therefore not justified. The reduced penalty was upheld, while enhancement of penalty was rejected and full deletion was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 180 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30520</link>
      <description>Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 was applied to accept reasonable cause for delayed payment of service tax during the initial period after banking and financial services entered the service tax net from 10-9-2004, so the penalty was reduced. However, the delay continued beyond that initial period, and complete waiver was therefore not justified. The reduced penalty was upheld, while enhancement of penalty was rejected and full deletion was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>