https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428179 The court upheld the validity of the supplementary complaint and order taking cognizance under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It found sufficient allegations against the petitioners regarding their involvement in converting illegally earned properties into proceeds of crime. The court emphasized that strict proof standards were not required at the stage of issuing process, leading to the dismissal of the petitions and upholding of the proceedings. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:30:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428179 The court upheld the validity of the supplementary complaint and order taking cognizance under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It found sufficient allegations against the petitioners regarding their involvement in converting illegally earned properties into proceeds of crime. The court emphasized that strict proof standards were not required at the stage of issuing process, leading to the dismissal of the petitions and upholding of the proceedings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428179