<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1365 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304420</link>
    <description>No reliable scientific method exists in India to determine the age of ink or the time when handwriting or a signature was affixed, so a request for forensic examination on that point was found to be futile. The dispute concerned a promissory note, where comparison of the disputed signature and expert opinion on the age of the writings were sought. Because such testing would not meaningfully assist adjudication, the order permitting appointment of a commissioner and forensic examination was set aside as legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1365 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304420</link>
      <description>No reliable scientific method exists in India to determine the age of ink or the time when handwriting or a signature was affixed, so a request for forensic examination on that point was found to be futile. The dispute concerned a promissory note, where comparison of the disputed signature and expert opinion on the age of the writings were sought. Because such testing would not meaningfully assist adjudication, the order permitting appointment of a commissioner and forensic examination was set aside as legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>