<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 196 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the mis-declaration of the value of imported goods, justifying the confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act. While acknowledging violations of Customs Act provisions and Customs Valuation Rules, the Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 5,000, considering the excessive nature of the initial penalty. The appeal was disposed of, providing a balanced resolution to the legal issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 196 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the mis-declaration of the value of imported goods, justifying the confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act. While acknowledging violations of Customs Act provisions and Customs Valuation Rules, the Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 5,000, considering the excessive nature of the initial penalty. The appeal was disposed of, providing a balanced resolution to the legal issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>